INTRODUCTION.
Thank you for making me Moderator.
Not long after being appointed as Moderator - Elect, I knew I had to
talk about the concept of the "Kingdom of God". I'm not going
to tell you something you don't already know, or prescribe some action you
ought to take. I simply want to describe the way I've been thinking over
the past few years. Cornelius Van Til used to come into his classroom and say:
"We're going to have an exercise in self expression today" -
meaning an exam! This Synod address could be described, too, as "An
exercise in self expression". For simplicity I'll talk about it under
four headings: [1] A Neglected Concept; [2] An Embracive Concept; [3] A
Transforming Concept; and [4] An Exciting Concept.
1. A NEGLECTED CONCEPT.
First of all, let me say something
about the Kingdom of God as a Neglected Concept - especially in our
Church and in our theological tradition.
[a] Reinterpretation.
When I was young, I heard - I can't say I was taught it,
because the subject of the Kingdom of God was hardly ever mentioned - I heard
or "gleaned" the idea that when the Gospel went out into the Greek
and Roman world, some of the Hebrew concepts were "reinterpreted" by
the Apostles - and fell into disuse. One of these was the "Kingdom of
God". It wasn't the Kingdom of God as such that was proclaimed - but
Christ as the essence of the Kingdom - was proclaimed, and thus the idea of the
Kingdom of God receded into the background and become largely irrelevant in the
preaching of the Gospel. I was happy to go along with this, because it
explained [1] the few references we had to the Kingdom in the rest of the NT;
and [2] the fact that there has been very attention paid to concept of the
Kingdom of God either in the Teaching, or Preaching, of the Church - and in
particular, the Reformed Church. It emphasized the Covenant - as the
embracive and integrating idea in the Bible and in Theology. But it often
puzzled me how a concept that loomed so large in the Teaching of Jesus lost
attention, both in the NT and in the theological reflection of the Church.
It’s not until recently that I began to question idea of "reinterpretation".
Two things led me to question it - first, [1] the fact that our present Gospels
were written at least 20-30 years after the Death and Resurrection of Jesus,
and second, [2] the occasional, but significant references to the Kingdom in
the rest of the New Testament. I asked myself, how could those who received the
Gospels really understand and appreciate them unless they knew about the
Kingdom of God. It was then that the few references to the Kingdom in the
rest of the NT took on a new significance. The references are few, not because
the idea had been reinterpreted, but because the idea was common! They knew
what it meant. I guess we have a situation analogous to the idea of "Covenant"
in the teaching of Jesus. The word Covenant is used only once. Do we conclude
from this that the Covenant was unimportant to Jesus? Not at all. The very
sparseness of references to it underline its pervasiveness. The same could be
said of the concept of the Kingdom of God in the Letters of the NT.
[b] Confessional Statement.
Another thing that's led to the concept being overlooked is the Confessional
identity of the Church and Kingdom of Christ. I refer to Statement on the
Church in Chapter 25, Section 2: "The visible Church, which is also
catholick or universal under the Gospel, [not confined to one nation, as before
under the law], consists of all these throughout the world that profess the
true religion, together with their children; and is the kingdom of the Lord
Jesus, the house and family of God, out of which there is no ordinary
possibility of salvation." With this identification of the Church with
the "Kingdom of Christ" the idea of the Church has
overshadowed that of the Kingdom. Its been made popular in our thinking by the
story of Andrew Melville's comment to James 6th when he let off
lightly the Roman Catholic Earls who sided with the Spanish. He plucked his
sleeve and called him "God's sillie vassal" and told him:
"There are two kings and two kingdoms in Scotland. There is Christ
Jesus the King and His Kingdom the Kirk, whose subject King James the Sixth is
and of whose kingdom not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member."
[Burleigh, A Church History of Scotland, pp 204-205]. And not
only has the idea been overshadowed by "the Church". Other
distinctions have been introduced. The Catechism talks about the "Kingdom
of Grace" and the "Kingdom of Glory" [Q. 102]. Good
and proper as these terms may be, the net result has been that the concept of
the Kingdom - not the reality, of course - has almost faded away to nothing.
[c] Summary.
So, because of the Theory of "Reinterpretation", and the emphasis
on the Church as the Kingdom and the Influence this has had in our tradition,
the idea of the Kingdom of God had been largely overlooked in my thinking. But
in being forced to re-examine it I have discovered what, to me, is an embracive,
transforming and exciting Concept.
2. AN EMBRACIVE CONCEPT.
And this brings me to the next thing I want to talk about, and that's the
thought that its an Embracive Concept. Geerhardus Vos, in his book on "The
Kingdom of God and the Church" warns us about becoming Pan -
Kingdomites - reducing the whole of our Theology to Kingdom Theology like
the older Liberals did in the 19th Century. But having made that
qualification, he says "it cannot be denied that in many respects the
idea of the Kingdom acted in our Lord's thought and teachings as the
crystallizing point around which several other elements of truth naturally
gathered and grouped themselves in harmonious combination." [p 12] He
goes on to speak about the Church, the Consummation; Righteousness; the Love
and Grace of God; "the great categories of subjective religion, faith
and repentance and regeneration;" miracles, and the historical
relation of Jesus' work to the OT, as all being embraced within the idea of the
Kingdom of God. Having said all that, we might say: What more is there! Let me
highlight some things that show me the embraciveness of the Kingdom.
[a] The Sovereignty of God.
For example, it's a concept that emphasizes the Sovereignty of God.
Any Reformed person must rejoice in anything that emphasizes the Supremacy and
Sovereignty of God. And if there's one concept in the Bible that does that it's
the idea of the Kingdom. The emphasis in the phrase, "the kingdom of
God" falls, not on community, nor on territory, but on the One whose
Kingdom it is. It brings to the forefront the Supremacy - the Kingship - of
God. Vos says "The conception is a God-centred conception to the very
core."[p 49] To the same effect are the words of John Murray in his
comments on Romans 14:17. He says: "It should not be forgotten that the
emphasis falls on the rule of God. It is the sphere in which God's sovereignty
is recognized and his will supreme. Thus the mention of God's kingdom should
always have the effect of summoning believers to that frame of mind that will
make them amenable to the paramount demand of their calling, the will of God"
[Romans, Vol. 2, p 193]. This supremacy of God finds expression in His Divine
Power. Jesus says, "if I drive out demons by the finger of God then the
Kingdom of God has come to you" [Luke 11:20]. It shows itself in His
Absolute Righteousness - both in terms of demand, gift, and realization. And it
shows itself in Divine Blessing expressed by in those words, "Do not be
afraid, little flock, for your Father has been pleased to give you the kingdom"
[Luke 12:32].
[b] The Covenant.
And this leads on to another idea that fits admirably within the Kingdom
Context: The Covenant. We're all keen on Covenant Theology because we find
in the Covenant an organizing principle that can do so much justice to Biblical
Teaching. But I would suggest to you that the proper context or
"home" for the Covenant itself is the Kingdom of God. We might put it
like this: Covenant Theology should be Kingdom Theology because the Covenant is
the instrument of Administration of the Kingdom. Its the way the King relates
to His subjects in His land - whether we think of Covenant in terms of Demand,
as we do in the case of the "Covenant of Works" or whether we
think of Covenant in terms of Grace - as we do in the "Covenant of
Grace". In both cases we deal with the Righteousness of the Kingdom
and in both cases the Sovereignty of God comes to the fore in the
"commanding" of the Covenant. We like to emphasize the unilateralness
of the Covenant of Grace - and rightly so. Within the framework of the Kingdom
that sovereignty comes to its own because the Covenant is the way God
administers His Kingdom. And this, in turn, bears out Vos' words when he says
that the idea of the Kingdom "carries the theocratic principle into the
very heart of soteriology." [Shorter Writings, p 311]. And if
the kingdom embraces the Covenant and indeed forms the content of the Covenant,
then surely it's a concept that we can't afford to forget or place in limbo.
[c] The Person, Offices, and Work of
Christ.
And if the Kingdom is administered by way of Covenant, then surely the
Kingdom provides a wonderful framework for the sum and substance of the
Covenant: the Person, Offices, and Work of our Lord Jesus Christ. The Lord
Jesus not only made the Kingdom of God the subject matter of His Preaching. He
also indicated that the Kingdom was bound up in his Person and Work. In his
person and Work the Kingdom had arrived and through Him the Kingdom is entered.
Nowhere is this made clearer than in John 3 where Jesus not only teaches
Nicodemus about the need to be born again to see the Kingdom, but goes on to
tell him about God's Great Love in the gift of His son. Those who believe in
Him don't perish, but have everlasting life. The blessing of the Kingdom belong
to those who believe in Jesus. And in the Kingdom, Jesus is Prophet; Priest;
and King. As our Prophet He teaches; as Priest He Saves; and as King He rules
in the Kingdom.
[d] The Church.
And this leads me on to make the point that the doctrine of the Church
itself finds a happy home within the context of the Kingdom of God. Any
view of either one that would suggest a hiatus or competition between the two
concepts ought to be dismissed at once. Similarly, any view that focuses
exclusively on the one, and not on the other, will, I believe, deprive us of a
rich vein of Biblical Teaching. As Vos has put it, if our Lord, notwithstanding
the dangers of misunderstanding that existed in his own day in his use of the
concept, "insisted upon making it the central theme of his teaching, we
may safely conclude that he must have ascribed to it a profound significance."
[Shorter Writings, p 310]. The Challenge for us is to do justice to both
ideas: To see the Church as a most important phase in the development of
the Kingdom which will find its perfection in the completed Kingdom of God. And
if we do keep the Kingdom idea in view it will enrich our understanding of so
many facets of the Church and elevate our work in it. We belong to the kingdom;
we work in the Kingdom - we are "ambassadors" for Christ in His
kingdom; and our goal, with Christ, is the Kingdom. And our work in Mission is
put in the framework of the Kingdom too: All power in Heaven and earth has been
given to Christ for the conquest of the World, so that ultimately God may reign
supreme throughout its utmost reaches.
[e] The Creation - and especially
the Land.
And last, but not least, the kingdom concept not only enriches our Hope
for the future, but enables us to gather into it some very important elements
that I think we tend to forget: The Creation; the Earth; and especially
the idea of the Land. If we just think of Covenant as our organizing
principle of theology, the idea of "the land" can be pushed to the
side or become a bit of an embarrassment. But the Kingdom idea demands Creation
- and Land. I like Graeme Goldworthy's definition of the Kingdom - "God's
people, in God's place, under God's rule." That just about sums up the
whole program of Redemption from Genesis to Revelation - and land has a
decisive part in the program - first in the Garden; then in Canaan; now in the
present, and then in the future. If the resurrection is real we need somewhere
to live! And I would suggest that we're "strangers and pilgrims"
here, not in the Greek sense that we're on our way from a physical existence to
a pure spiritual existence, but in the sense that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
were strangers and pilgrims in the land of Promise. We're strangers and
pilgrims because it isn't yet ours. But one day it will be - and come as a gift
of God! And the Kingdom idea - as demanding a domain for us ultimately to live
- and the consummation of God's Purpose for this world and his creation -
allows this idea to come to its own, just as typically the possession of the land
came into its own in the possession of Canaan.
3. A TRANSFORMING CONCEPT.
And this leads me to another thing I would like to say about the Kingdom
Idea: It's a Transforming Concept. Its like leaven: It touches
every aspect of Theology and Life, and transforms them.
[a] Transforms our Outlook.
For example it transforms our Outlook. I think the idea of the
Kingdom of God is one of the most physical - and therefore historical -
concepts that's brought before us in the Bible. And it may well be this 'earthy'
aspect that has led to its neglect. Most of us have a good dose of Greek
thinking in us simply because Greek thinking is non-Christian thinking.
If you doubt that just try looking up Commentators on the words of Jesus,
"Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth"! It's
the sort of thinking that's always trying to find sin in the physical
instead of in ourselves - whether its in the environment; or in our bodies.
Salvation then becomes - as it does in non - Christian religions - escape from the
physical. The Kingdom idea acts as a powerful counterweight to that way of
thinking in its inclusion of the physical and the historical. It brings us down
to earth as the sphere of our existence and our future. To be sure it
emphasizes the Supremacy of God - but it's the Supremacy of God in the world He
has made as the habitation for His people.
[b] Transforms our Theological Ideas.
And then it transforms our Theological Ideas. I think we all realize
that the framework in which we put things is important for their full
understanding. This applies particularly to words. Sometimes we can use the
same words, and not mean the same things. For example, "Democracy"
means something different to a Communist than it does to those in the West, and
indeed a Bible Believing Christian! "Foreknowledge" means
something altogether different for a Calvinist and Arminian. In the same way,
words like "Salvation" takes on a deeper, and richer meaning
when they're related to the Kingdom of God. It doesn't cease to be spiritual,
but becomes wholistic - embracive of both body and soul, and land and
everything else as well! Likewise, according to Jesus, "Repentance"
has to be orientated to the Kingdom of God. Even the work of Christ
takes on a more embracive meaning when related to the Kingdom. What content we
can then pour into that title "the Saviour of the world" when
we put it in the context of the Kingdom, rather than allowing it stand alone.
[c] Transforms our Exegesis and
Application.
And then again, the kingdom concept transforms our Exegesis and
Application. [1] For example, it affects our Exegesis. Sometime ago
I picked up Kennedy's "Expository Lectures" - and turned to
his exposition of those words of Jesus, "the meek shall inherit the
earth." And this is what he said: "This does not mean that at
some future time the saints of God should have the earth and use it..." What
does it mean then? It means that the earth is their preparation for heaven.
"On earth they were effectually called; on earth they shall serve him; on
earth his good work in them will be finished etc." And finally,
"In the earth they shall find a bed in which their bodies shall sleep till
the resurrection morning. And from the earth they shall pass in soul and body
to their home in the Father's house. In other words, we inherit the
earth now in the sense of living in it until we die. Its strange how the "shall"
is turned into the "now" for this Beatitude! A greater
appreciation of the Kingdom of God in its historical development, and final
glorious consummation, will, I believe, help us to avoid such
misinterpretations.
[2] But it also affects our Application. In particular, it does away
with what I would call "Ecclesiastical Imperialism" where the
believer's whole life is to be taken up with "church" activities.
Ministers, when talking about the Christian's responsibility, often focus only
on Church activities - and, in this context - warn Christians that "only
work done for Christ will survive". They thereby give the impression,
wittingly, or unwittingly, that only Church work is the Lord's work, and the
rest of life is largely irrelevant. But Christians have their Callings from
God too - and if they have tasted the powers of the age to come, and desire
the supremacy of God in all things, then they will also work to bring every
thought into captivity to Christ in the whole of life. I would suggest that the
Kingdom of God provides that wider context for all our activities and gets rid
of the Pietistic influence that still lingers on in us all.
During my Long Service Leave, I listened to an excellent sermon on the
Imprecatory Psalms - [Rev. Peter Gadsby]. But as I sat there with the farmers,
and housewives - and yes, as I thought about having to paint the
house on Monday - I wondered what was the connection between the words I was
hearing, and the work I had to do. I knew there was one, but I also knew it
would take me some time to work it all out! I haven't done so yet, but I'm
convinced that the concept of the Kingdom is the way to go in solving the
problem.
[d] Transforms Our Life.
And this leads into one other area where this concept is transforming, and that's
in the whole of our Christian Lives. God's kingdom was our Lord's first
concern - and its reflected in his teaching about prayer and about life. And to
the extent that it becomes a key factor in ours it will transform our life too.
[1] For example what about our priorities in Prayer. One difficulty I've
always had is following the order of the Lord's Prayer in my own prayers. He
placed the Hallowing of God's Name and the Coming of his Kingdom first and
foremost. I've found that as I've explored this concept, I've been better able
to try to give that proper attention. [2] And then there's our Praise.
Coming to the Psalms with this idea, you often see them in a new light: Not
truncated and man - centred but God - centred. [3] And then there's the
impact it has on our Life. The Kingdom of God was uppermost in our Lord's
thinking; in our Lord's Work; in our Lord's Prayer. And so he says to us,
amidst all our seeking: "Seek first the Kingdom of God, and all these
things will be added to you." God is our highest good - our "summum
bonum" - and therefore His Kingdom must have the priority in our
lives. Vos says somewhere that "Kingdom consciousness is God consciousness"
and the more I think about it the more I believe him to be right.
4. AN EXCITING CONCEPT.
The last thing I would say about this Concept is that its an Exciting
Concept. And its an exciting concept because it, perhaps more than any
other, links together the Present and Future aspects of our Salvation. It does
this through the Present and Future Aspects of the Kingdom: The Kingdom
is here now; The Kingdom is yet to Come.
[a] The Kingdom is Here.
What an amazing message the Lord Jesus began preaching in Galilee - The
Kingdom of God "is at hand". That this wasn't in the far distant
future is emphasized when he says, "From the days of John the Baptist
until now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful
men lay hold of it" [Matthew 11:12]. And yet he predicted that in the not
too distant future it was to come with power. This it did in his death and
resurrection. And the upshot of it is this: The kingdom of God is here. The
powers of the world to come are already operative now. God has set up
his rule in the Person and Work of his Son and it will fill the earth.
Understood in the right way, we could say: "the Best has Already Been"!
The great foundational work of the Kingdom has been accomplished in the death
and resurrection of Jesus. Those who lay hold on Him are Forgiven; Justified;
and Adopted into the Family of God. What higher status can we reach? Already
we're risen with Christ and seated with him in heavenly places. We have arrived
- as Hebrews 12:22 makes abundantly clear. What a Privilege! And what a Message
to deliver: The Kingdom of God has come! Repent and believe the Good News!
[b] The Kingdom is to Come.
But yet its still to come! And so we long for this Kingdom, and work for
full realization, knowing it will come not as a result of our work but as
a gift of God. And so Jesus teaches us to pray: "Your kingdom
come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven". His will is
already done in heaven. It's the earth that needs to be brought into subjection
to Him. And when it is, the kingdom will be delivered up to the Father, that
God may be all in all [1 Corinthians 15:28].
CONCLUSION.
Now you
might say to me: We know all this. We've been preaching and teaching all this.
Well all I would say is this: How come we haven't heard much about the Kingdom?
To be sure, we have preached, and talked, and written about everything in the
Kingdom of God. But we haven't said anything about it! And I
think we've been the poorer for it. I believe that our preaching and teaching
and our lives can be enriched tremendously by a greater appreciation and use of
the concept of the Kingdom of God.
There it is then. I give you no exciting program for the future; no
suggestions on how we may address our present state and solve our present
problems. I only give you some thoughts on the Concept of the Kingdom of God.
And yet, perhaps that in itself is all we need: To be grasped by this
Idea; to "see" the Kingdom of God; to see the King in His Kingdom; to
see it in its present reality and future glory; and seek that Kingdom with all
our hearts. Perhaps that will do more for our lethargy, and inactivity, and
sense of helplessness than all the programs we could ever devise. At least its
helping me!
Following are the notes of the author's devotions, presented daily during
the Synod meeting.
TUESDAY: THE GRACE OF THE KINGDOM.
Readings: Matthew 20:1-15; Matthew 18:21-35.
INTRODUCTION.
Let's think this morning about the Grace of the Kingdom of the Kingdom, and
I want to focus on three things:- [1] The Sovereignty of Grace; [2] The
Superabundance of Grace; and [3] The Seriousness of Grace.
1. THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GRACE.
The Sovereignty of God's Grace is brought out in Matthew 20:1-15 where we
have what's called the Parable of "The Labourers in the Vineyard".
The Lord is pictured as an Estate Owner who is gracious and generous. He's
not only interested in His Vineyard, but also the Unemployed. There's a number
of surprises here.
[a] One Surprise is that He hires men at 5 o'clock in the afternoon, just
before knock off time! By this time most people would have given up any hope of
getting some work for the day. By the same token, very few people would begin
to hire people at 5' o clock! But lo and behold, here's an Estate owner who
hires people almost at knock off time!
[b] Another Surprise is that when they come to get paid, he starts with
those who had worked the shortest time. I suppose we'd naturally suppose that
those who had worked all day would get the first break. But this landlord
reverses the normal procedure - no doubt to make sure that those who had worked
longest knew what the others received.
[c] And then comes the third surprise - they all get paid the same amount,
whether they worked the whole day, or just the one hour - one denarius.
[d] Application. I think many of us secretly identify a bit with those who
worked all day, and complained about their pay. It seems reasonable! But our
Lord has painted this vivid, and apparently unfair, picture to remind us of
one great truth: God is under no obligation whatever to man his creature
and we cannot create an obligation. All that any of us have, we have because of
God's mercy. And hard as it may appear, we ought to be very pleased that God
doesn't deal with us on the basis of strict justice or sound economics! In that
case, none of us would have any hope at all. Rather, He deals with us on the
basis of His gracious action, both in putting us into his vineyard, and giving
us a reward far beyond our deserts.
2 THE SUPERABUNDANCE OF GRACE.
Another Parable about the Grace of the Kingdom is found in Matthew
18:21-35. "The Kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to
settle accounts with his servants. As he began the settlement, a man who owed
him ten thousand talents was brought to him...." Its not hard to find
someone to identify with at the beginning of this Parable. We readily
see ourselves in the person who has been forgiven such a tremendous debt. And
so it is.
[a] Great Debts.
We have a Great Debt. Someone has estimated that this person owed about 5
million. He didn't have a hope of repaying it. Our debt cannot be quantified.
The wages of one sin is death.
[b]Great Forgiveness.
By the same token, we have received a Great Forgiveness in Christ. We have
been forgiven a great debt. Forgiven, simply because we asked God
for forgiveness.
[c] Great Grace.
How rich and full is that abundant grace. And as Ridderbos points out, Jesus
can teach that the grace of the Kingdom is free and full simply because He's
the One who's ultimately paying for it. He says: "He not only proclaims
salvation, but is its bearer, and acquirer, and sharer of it with His
followers."
3. THE SERIOUSNESS OF GRACE.
And last, but not least, our Lord taught about the seriousness of Grace.
In this same Parable that shows us the Superabundance of Grace, we also see
that the experience of Grace brings with it the exercise of Grace - and if it
doesn't, it shows that our claim to grace is a sham. The sting of the Parable
is in the tail: "This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you
unless you forgive your brother from the heart." Those words underline
a fundamental principle of the Kingdom of God administered by Christ: There
is no forgiveness for us if we're not prepared to forgive also.
Perhaps you think me unkind to draw attention to such a practical thing at
our Synod Meeting. But do we not all need to hear this afresh? It so easy to
talk about the Sovereignty of Grace, and the Superabundance of Grace that we
have in Christ - and rightly so - and yet fail to show grace towards others who
owe us a trivial amount. But the Kingdom of God is not a matter of talk, but of
power - and part of that "power" is the transformed lives that we're
to live. Our Church has had its fair share of people who have carried
unresolved problems for years - and perhaps are still carrying them. Its time
that we began to practice - not what we preach - but what we ourselves
personally claim to have received from God himself: Forgiveness. The bottom
line is this: If we claim grace we're bound to show grace. It’s not an optional
extra.
CONCLUSION.
And just one final thought. Let's remember who it is who reminds us of the
Sovereignty of God in Grace; the Superabundance of Grace; and the Seriousness
of Grace. Its our Lord Jesus - who worked harder and endured more than any of us
to achieve these blessings for us. And it is He, who at great personal cost,
secured the payment of our great debt who himself says to us "This is
how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother
from the heart." If He has secured this Grace for us at such great
personal cost, how do you think he'll feel if we treat it with such
thanklessness and carelessness?
WEDNESDAY: THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM.
Mark 4:26-34.
In these Parables the Lord Jesus teaches us about the Growth of the Kingdom.
On the one side, the Lord Jesus indicates that the progress of the Gospel is
just like farming. Just as the farmer sows the seed, waits for it to grow
[because he can't make it grow himself] and then harvests it, so it is with the
Gospel in human life. On the other side, he tells us that the development of
the Kingdom of God is like the growth of a large tree from only a tiny seed.
There's only a small beginning, but the Good News about the Kingdom goes out -
and goes deep - until it produces something out of all proportion to its
original beginning. In these two illustrations there's a number of lessons for
us about the growth and advancement of His Kingdom in the World.
1. THE KINGDOM GROWS FROM SEED.
First of all, we're reminded here that the Development and Progress of
the Kingdom of God comes through sowing the Word of God. Just as the
farmer, if he wants to get a harvest, must get in and sow his seed, so also
must the Word of God be sown if the Kingdom of God is going to advance in the
world. If it’s not sown then, humanly speaking, the rule of God will not come -
and the harvest will not be reaped.
[a] The Importance of Sowing.
I'm sure it’s our greatest desire to see the Coming of God's Kingdom. It’s
already present - and because its present, we desire to see it continue to grow
until the time when it comes completely. But it will only come about through the
distribution and communication of the Word of God. The Word of God must go
out. If that Word is not communicated, then the rule of God in human life will
not develop and grow.
[b] The Way the Seed Is Sown.
How are we to sow the Word of God as Christians? We need to
"strive together" for the faith of the Gospel. Without
co-operation and enthusiasm nothing much will be accomplished. Sow sparingly -
and we'll reap sparingly. Don't sow at all - and we won't get a harvest. What
should engage our attention, then, is how we can contribute to the
communication of the Word of God - and then do something tangible to achieve
it.
2. THE SEED DOES ITS OWN WORK.
The second thing that comes out here is that the Word [or the Seed] does
its own work. Once the seed is sown, says our Lord, it does its own work
- it grows automatically. In fact the farmer, to a large extent, is fairly
powerless. He can't make the seed to grow. Nor does it grow any better
if he worries about it or not, or has a lot of sleepless nights. The seed
grows by itself. He may be able to cultivate it, water it, and maybe keep
the weeds down. But the actual growth is outside his power.
The Apostle makes the same point in 1 Corinthians 3. He says: "What,
after all, is Apollos? And what is Paul? Only servants, through whom you came
to believe - as the Lord has assigned to each his task. I planted the seed,
Apollos watered it, but God made it grow. So neither he who plants nor he who
waters is anything, but only God, who makes things grow." [1 Corinthians 3:5-7] God
alone, working through His Word, can bring about the growth and development of
His Rule in human life.
Sometimes we worry about things we shouldn't worry about - and sometimes we
don't worry [or think] about the things we should be concerned about. Here is a
case in point. Sometimes we wonder whether the Word of God will take root in a
person's life. Sometimes we prejudge the issue and say: "It would be a
waste of time sowing the Word of God there - there would be no growth."
The result is - we don't bother to sow, or we become pessimistic, and worried
about the reception of the Word. We have to listen again to what the Lord Jesus
says: The Word will grow irrespective of all our worries. So, if we want to
worry, let's worry about our job - and leave the results in the
hand of God.
3. THE KINGDOM GROWS GRADUALLY.
The third thing we're reminded of here is that the Growth of the
Kingdom is Gradual. Jesus says: "First the stalk, then the ear,
then the kernel in the ear." There's order in the development of the
Kingdom of God in the World and in Human Life. Just because it's a spiritual
reality it doesn't mean there's no order. Stage follows Stage. This happens,
for example, in the case of God's rule in a person's life. It happens too, in
the progress of God's rule in the World. It too runs through this development:
From the early Christian Church right through the present time and up to the
Return of the Lord Jesus. The Kingdom is never static. It’s always developing,
and getting nearer to Harvest time.
We need to remember this, because sometimes we get very impatient. We
don't think we're making progress, and become very discouraged. We can be like
some gardeners who have an irrepressible urge to dig up the seeds to see if
they're growing. If we don't see immediate progress, we become discouraged. We
need to take on board what the Lord Jesus says here about the Growth of the
Kingdom: It will be orderly and gradual.
4. THE GROWTH OF THE KINGDOM IS GOING TO
BE GREAT.
And finally, we're reminded here that the Growth of God's Kingdom is
going to be Great. The Lord Jesus uses a remarkable illustration: The
Tiny mustard seed growing into a big tree. God's rule in Human Life may have
been - and often still is - insignificant in the eyes of the World. But its
designed to get bigger - and it will get bigger. In the Book of Daniel it’s the
stone that smashes into the image and gets bigger and bigger until it becomes a
great mountain and fills the whole earth! The Church of God will never be a
"has been". God's cause both in the individual Christian's Life, and
in the World, will be accomplished. His will will be done on earth as its being
done in heaven. His Rule will cover the earth. He's the Saviour of the World.
How encouraging this thought must have been to our Lord's disciples - few in
number, faced with the opposition of the Jewish People, and by the Mighty Power
of the Roman Empire! And how comforting and encouraging it is for us not only
in itself, but where we stand in the history of the Kingdom of God. We can see
today what the disciples could not see, and yet believed: The Growth of the
Kingdom of God. It spans the centuries, and it spans the world - and it will
continue to grow till it fills the earth. It’s going to increase, until
finally, when Jesus returns, His Kingdom will come in all its power and glory.
What an incentive to work and pray and long for its realization! What a
glorious prospect awaits those in whose heart the Lord sets up his rule.
THURSDAY: THE GLORY OF THE KINGDOM
INTRODUCTION.
Let's turn now to 1 Corinthians 15:22-28. "For as in Adam all die, so
in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own turn: Christ, the
firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. Then the end will
come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed
all dominion, authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his
enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death. For he
"has put everything under his feet." Now when it says that
"everything" has been put under him, it is clear that this does not
include God himself, who put everything under Christ. When he has done this, then
the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so
that God may be all in all." 1 Corinthians 15:22-28.
Its nice to get a difficult text to work on isn't it! And this is certainly
one of them. Hodge reviews some of the interpretations and Symington in his
book on the Dominion of Christ spends a bit of time and dealing with the
question: What will our Lord do, if he gives up the Kingdom. Will his
role as Mediator cease? What implications does this have for Christology.
Interesting as they are, I'm not going to deal with these questions, but rather
focus on the last few words in these verses: "That God may be all in
all".
1. THE GOAL OF THE KINGDOM.
In the first instance that expresses the Goal of the Kingdom. The
Kingdom of God under Christ as King - which is essentially a Kingdom of
Conquest - will be completed - and in that completed Kingdom which is delivered
up or handed back to the Father, "God will be all in all."
At the opening of Synod, I mentioned that one of the leading ideas of the
Kingdom is the Supremacy and Sovereignty of God. The "Kingdom of God"
is where God is supreme - and where this supremacy reveals itself in Divine
Power demonstrated in our Lord's miracles which are a pledge of the
supernatural renewal of the world ; Divine Righteousness - both demanded and
bestowed, and in Divine Blessing in the Gift of the Kingdom to His people. It
emphasizes the Kingship of God. And in emphasizing the Supremacy and
Kingship of God it also, surprisingly, leads to the thought of God as Father.
In the ancient world, the king was regarded as a "Father" to his
people - and this thought comes out in Isaiah 9 where, when the kingship of the
Lord Jesus is being talked about, one of the titles given is, "Everlasting
Father". Kingship and Fatherhood are not opposites; they're kindred ideas
- and our Lord brings them together in the Prayer he taught his disciples. In
teaching us to pray for the Supremacy of God in the world, he also teaches us
to look upon Him as "Our Father in heaven". And here we're told that
at the end the Kingdom will be handed over to "God the Father."
2. THE GOAL OF CHRIST.
And then we're reminded here that this is the Goal of Christ: The
Glory of God in the Completion of the Kingdom.
[a] Our Lord's Programme.
To our Lord has been given the task of bringing that supremacy of God our
Father to its fulfilment in the world. Every thing has been put in subjection
to Him for this very purpose: "He must reign until he has put all his
enemies under his feet". Two stages are distinguished here:
[1] The Exaltation and Enthronment of Christ - all has been put under
him. Christ has been put in charge of everything. He's Head of the church, and
head over all things for the benefit of the Church. He's been given a name
above every name. And he's now working to bring everything into subjection to
God. And as members and office bearers in the Church we have the privilege to
play a part in that subjugation.
[2] And then there's the Culmination of All Things - after he has
destroyed all dominion, authority and power including death itself. He is the
firstfruits. Satan's Kingdom - a Kingdom of Death - will be utterly vanquished.
As Vos puts it, those powerful principles and forces of the Kingdom "must
inevitably result in the production of a spiritual, ethical and social organism
which will ultimately show itself in "the one all-comprehensive and
permanent organization of redeemed humanity." [Vos, p. 315] And when
that has been achieved, then God will be all in all. His glory will fill the
whole Creation - and like Canaan of old it will be his House or Sanctuary.
[b] Its Implications.
If we think that there's any hiatus between the Kingdom of God, and the
Kingdom of Christ [the "Church form" of the kingdom] - that
somehow we don't honour Christ and his Church if we give attention to the
Kingdom of God - then forget it! This is what our Lord focused on, worked for,
and is still working for today. That's His supreme concern and His supreme
desire. He came into the world to achieve it; He works now to extend it; and
one day he will deliver the kingdom to the Father. In him subdued sinners, and
a subdued world will be offered to God so that God may be all in all.
3. THE GOAL OF GOD'S PEOPLE.
If the glory of God is the Goal of the kingdom, and the Goal of Christ, then
it is and must also be the Goal of God's people.
[a] It's the Goal of the Covenant. The heart of the
Covenant is that God will be "our God" in all the riches of that
thought. There's no greater blessing than that!
[b] It's the Goal of God's Grace. In Ephesians 2 Paul
says that God has raised us up so that "in the ages to come he might
show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in
Christ."
[c] It's the Goal enshrined in our Catechism - Q/A 1. "Man's
chief end is to glorify God and enjoy him." The Catechism really
expresses what the Kingdom is all about when it tells us our chief purpose is
to glorify God and enjoy Him forever: God is to be all in all - the object of
glory and the source of enjoyment.
[d] And finally, It's the Goal of our lives - the goal
we're to live for, work for, pray for and die for it. Our agendas and concerns
are not the first priority. It's the Glory of God. To be sure He's bound
together his glory with our own good. But nevertheless the order must be: "Seek
first the Kingdom of God and all these things will be added to you".
CONCLUSION.
"That God may be all in all" - that's the Goal of the
Kingdom and the Goal of Christ. It must be our goal too - today, tomorrow, and
always.
|